New Jersey federal court convicts man of laundering money orders from a stolen safe
Ruben Cruz was convicted on 15 October 2026 after a trial in Camden federal court of stolen property offences, conspiracy to launder money and seven money laundering counts over a safe taken from a Glassboro business.
Ruben Cruz, 33, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Davenport, Florida, was convicted on 15 October 2026 following a three-day trial before US District Judge Christine P. O'Hearn in Camden federal court, the US Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey said. He was convicted of conspiracy to transport stolen property interstate, interstate transportation of stolen property, conspiracy to launder money and seven counts of money laundering.
According to the US Attorney's Office, over the July 4th holiday weekend in 2021, Cruz and a co-conspirator, Ricky Rivas-Ortiz, stole a safe containing over $2 million in money orders and cash from a business in Glassboro, New Jersey, and took it to Philadelphia. Rivas-Ortiz previously pleaded guilty to interstate transportation of stolen property and was sentenced to 21 months in prison.
The US Attorney's Office says the money orders were laundered by altering them and depositing them in installments. It says Cruz deposited some of the money orders on the same day at neighbouring banks and deposited others at a single branch over several consecutive days.
Each money laundering count and the laundering conspiracy count carry a maximum of 20 years in prison. Sentencing is scheduled for 24 February 2027. The US Postal Inspection Service and IRS Criminal Investigation investigated the case, with assistance from the Gloucester County Prosecutor's Office and the Elk Township Police Department.
Why it matters to AML professionals
Stolen negotiable instruments such as money orders are often turned into usable funds through ordinary bank deposits. Deposit patterns spread across branches and days can be the only visible sign, so AML professionals in branch and monitoring roles are often the first to see them.
Red flags in this case
- Several money orders deposited by one customer on the same day at different nearby banks or branches
- Repeated deposits of money orders at one branch over consecutive days, each kept to a small amount
- Money orders that show signs of alteration, such as changed payee names or amounts
- A customer with no clear business reason holding a large number of money orders from one issuer or seller
If this landed in your queue
- Pull all money order deposits by the customer across branches and channels for the period, not just the alerted day
- Check the money orders' serial numbers, issuer and purchase details, and contact the issuer to confirm they were validly sold and not reported stolen
- Review deposit images for alterations and compare the payee and endorsement details with the account holder
- Document the deposit pattern and escalate for a suspicious activity report decision, placing holds under your bank's procedures where items appear altered or stolen
Key terms
- Money order
- A prepaid payment instrument bought for a fixed amount and used like a check; it can be cashed or deposited by the named payee.
- Interstate transportation of stolen property
- A US federal crime of moving stolen goods, money or securities across state lines, knowing they were stolen.
- Conspiracy to launder money
- An agreement between two or more people to carry out money laundering; it can be charged even if each person handles only part of the scheme.
Interview angle
How would you investigate a customer who deposits many money orders across several branches?
Describe gathering the full deposit history across branches, verifying the instruments with the issuer, checking for alterations, assessing whether the activity fits the customer's profile, and escalating for a suspicious activity report decision with clear documentation.
Sources
Go deeper on AMLift
Every fact in AMLift News Desk stories comes from an official source: a regulator, court, government gazette or the company's own filing.
Report an error
Every report is checked against the official source. If we got something wrong, the story is corrected.